![]() ![]() We used Fusion 4.1.3, Fusion 5.0.1, Parallels 7, Parallels 8.797180 (we have to talk to Parallels about a simpler versioning scheme), and VirtualBox 4.2 to virtualize Windows 7 Professional 64-bit.Īll virtual machines were stored on and accessed from an external Pegasus R4 Thunderbolt RAID array with four 3 TB 7200 rpm hard drives in a RAID 5 configuration. Our tests were performed on a 2011 27-inch iMac at 3.4 GHz with 16 GB of RAM, running OS X 10.8.1. Read on for the ultimate performance comparison between Parallels 7, Parallels 8, Fusion 4, Fusion 5, Virtual Box, and Boot Camp. We’ve spent a few days testing and we now have our results. ![]() ![]() Readers were also curious about native Windows performance in Boot Camp. Many readers asked us to perform additional testing to determine the improvements between Parallels 7 and 8, and how the free VirtualBox software compared to the paid options. A head-to-head comparison showed that Parallels 8 beat Fusion 5 overall, although performance was very close in most benchmarks. #VIRTUALBOX M1 MAX MAC OS#A few weeks ago, we provided a look at the major options for Windows virtualization on Mac OS X: Parallels Desktop 8 and VMware Fusion 5. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |